Jury Of Executive Opinion Method
If yous have the title Primary Executive Officer slapped side by side to your name, you've probably heard a lot of opinions almost your performance and even your character over the years. Powerful people tend to be polarizing by nature. It's been that style since earlier Jesus turned the water into wine. (Talk almost polarizing!)
The signal is elementary — CEOs will never please anybody. Nonetheless, these CEOs have fabricated decisions that divided public stance a lot more their peers (and so far) in 2021.
Adam Neumann, WeWork
No Neumann has attracted more vitriol since Jerry Seinfeld's pesky mailman/neighbor wreaked his unique brand of havoc in the '90s. Yous may accept seen Adam Neumann in the headlines recently, as the former CEO of WeWork received a reported $one.7 billion buyout.
Neumann co-founded the once successful company, but he was too the mastermind behind its rapid spiral from a trendy startup with a rumored valuation of $twenty billion to a company skewered as little more than than a real estate scam. Critics argued that Neumann was being rewarded for failure. His fans said Neumann is nothing short of a genius (ye jealous haters).
Elizabeth Holmes is the most notorious CEO since the Enron guys contributed to a national financial crisis. She was brash, she wore a blackness mock turtleneck similar Steve Jobs and she was supposed to revolutionize the healthcare manufacture. She turned out to be revolutionizing piffling more than than false methods of self-promotion.
Holmes was fired as CEO of Theranos in 2018, but 2019 saw a bevy of Theranos-related documentaries, books and podcasts that kept Lizzy very much relevant. If you still aren't enlightened of who Elizabeth Holmes is and what she'southward almost, y'all've got some homework to practice.
Kevin Burns, Juul Labs
Juul was once the hottest vape on the market. If there was e'er an constructive campaign to get kids non to fume, Juul was it. The flavors…the clouds…the Juul — only let's non go sidetracked marketing Juul.
Juul's sometime CEO, Kevin Burns, resigned this year amid a "cloud" of awful PR. Although Burns is not directly responsible for the "vaping crunch," as some accept dubbed information technology, he had to know the health risks to users when he accepted the position. Would y'all accept taken the job without knowing every item about the most pop vape on the market place?
Harald Krueger, BMW
It'south non ever the instance, but when a CEO steps downwardly, it's often because the company isn't thriving. Harald Krueger was employed past BMW for the better part of three decades, ultimately ascending to the function of CEO, a position he held for 4 years.
Just all good things come up to an terminate, and Krueger's time at the top of BMW was largely defined by sweeping changes in the automotive industry — namely, a tendency toward the product of electric vehicles. Electric vehicles are non BMW's forte, and Krueger ultimately took the fall for information technology.
Kevin Tsujihara, Warner Bros.
Equally society has become much more focused on speaking out confronting sexual harassment and punishing the culprits, it was inevitable that Hollywood types like Kevin Tsujihara of Warner Bros. would pay the cost. Tsujihara recently resigned from his position as CEO, although he hasn't been bedevilled until the formal legal process unfolds.
That said, allegations suggest Tsujihara promised acting roles to at to the lowest degree ane extra he sexually harassed. A resignation isn't a confession, of course, but information technology isn't the best look when maintaining your innocence. These types of allegations garner controversy, to put information technology mildly.
Hiroto Saikawa, Nissan
You lot may believe that CEOs are grossly overpaid, simply plain former Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa embraces a dissimilar railroad train of thought. He was one of the well-nigh prominent names to fall from grace afterwards he admitted that he and other Nissan executives intentionally overpaid themselves.
If yous had the power to overpay yourself, information technology might be difficult to resist — if y'all're completely defective in moral character. Otherwise, you would have to embrace the office of disgraced CEO, but every bit Saikawa did. He probably thinks information technology was a practiced run while information technology lasted.
Rupert Hogg, Communist china Pacific Airways
If you've been paying attending to the controversy embroiling the NBA regarding the Hong Kong protests, you may have realized that the topic is quite polarizing. LeBron James isn't the only 1 who has been swept upward in the controversy. Rupert Hogg (great proper noun), the erstwhile CEO of Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airlines, lost his job over the matter.
More than specifically, Hogg refused to expose the employees at Cathay who had participated in pro-democracy protests, despite pressure from the Chinese government. Apparently, this decision created plenty tension that he "resigned," which undoubtedly ways he was forced to exit, in his example.
Richard Plepler, HBO
Richard Plepler is what some in the entertainment industry would refer to equally a "lifer." He was a fixture at Home Box Office, more commonly known as HBO, for 27 years. Afterward he was promoted to Chairman and CEO, he oversaw a period of growth that cemented HBO equally a staple in the popular culture lexicon.
When a company moves to new management, there is always a adventure the cultural values won't mesh. That was plain the case when AT&T purchased HBO in 2018. Plepler reportedly lost some autonomy as a result of the acquisition, so he chose independence over power.
Timothy Sloan, Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo'south public reputation has been so heavily battered and bruised that anybody who becomes the face of the visitor is going to face some big challenges with the public. Sloan took over the CEO mail service in 2016 with a mandate to clean upwardly the beleaguered bank's reputation.
Sloan had worked for Wells Fargo for 31 years, so he was never really viewed by most critics as the outsider the company needed to plough its reputation around. He ultimately stepped down, peradventure after reaching the same determination himself.
Marking Zuckerberg, Facebook
Mark Zuckerberg has go a cultural icon, and he deserves a lot of praise as a businessman. Equally everyone knows, he took a clever idea conceived in his Harvard dorm room to its electric current status as one of the bedrocks of Silicon Valley. Simply has Zuck ventured too far out of his lane?
His critics believe that Facebook'due south foray into politics, healthcare and several other fields beyond "social" illustrate just how power-hungry Zuckerberg has become. Others go along to praise his genius, foresight and ability to tackle new arenas. It's the classic recipe for a controversial CEO.
Elon Musk, Tesla and SpaceX
What can yous say about Elon Musk? Well, how many other CEOs have smoked pot on the most pop podcast on the planet? How many other CEOs have sparked investigations from the Securities and Exchange Commission based on a series of tweets? That'due south right, zero.
Musk is hailed as a one-of-a-kind visionary who intends to have humans living on Mars in no time — at to the lowest degree by his supporters. Critics are quick to classify him as an entitled egomaniac who is long on bluster and brusque on results. Which is it — nut job, con man or complicated genius?
Jeff Bezos, Amazon
There's no denying that Amazon provides perhaps the most reliable, useful consumer service known to man. Desire the latest bestselling novel the solar day it comes out? Amazon. Run out of paw soap or babe nutrient and need more tomorrow? Amazon. The visitor gives you access to almost anything you want without e'er leaving your couch.
In a convenience civilization, Amazon is considered a godsend. On the other hand, Amazon likewise collects more user information and knows more than about the details of consumers' lives than practically whatever other site not named Google. This makes Bezos a highly controversial figure.
Bob Iger, Disney
Disney is inherently a honey-it-or-hate-it company. Some indicate to the company's acquisition as ESPN as the turning betoken that led to the demise of the channel's policy of exclusively focusing on sports. Various opinions also exist on the cultural bear upon of Disney and its ongoing event on the youth of the world.
As the face of Disney, CEO Bob Iger enjoys the high of the pro-Disney praise as well every bit the low of the anti-Disney detest. Throw in that Iger was paid approximately $66 meg final yr — stupid coin — to run Mickey Mouse Corp., and the haters simply have more fuel to throw on their contemptuous fire.
Satya Nadella, Microsoft
When you accept over a company formerly run by someone equally famous and admired as Nib Gates, you better expect your every motion to exist heavily scrutinized. Microsoft's Satya Nadella embraced some sky-loftier expectations when he took the job as CEO, but thick skin doesn't make the criticism any less real.
Nadella has his fair share of supporters, and Microsoft remains one of the most prominent and trusted brands in calculating, gaming and several other sectors. In fact, nigh calculator users couldn't behave out essential tasks without Microsoft. Still, the nature of the make he works for makes Satya Nadella controversial at times.
Hock Tan, Broadcom, Inc.
If you thought the $52 million FleetCor's CEO made this year was exorbitant and the $66 one thousand thousand Bob Iger netted as CEO of Disney was obscene, then expect until you hear nigh Hock Tan. Broadcom's CEO is loaded.
Hock is manifestly hawkish when it comes to raking in the dough. He made a reported $103 million in 2017 for running the semiconductor infrastructure company. Most people have never fifty-fifty heard of Broadcom, which proves the most influential (and well-paid executives) oftentimes remain behind the scenes.
Les Moonves, CBS
Sure, it'south 2021, but people don't forget sexual crimes. We've touched on many of the most scandalous CEOs of this year, but the lingering odor of the CBS sexual harassment scandal revelations fabricated in 2018 still linger for many. Erstwhile CEO Les Moonves was at the eye of the harassment allegations and was even accused of assault.
CBS ultimately denied Moonves the $120 million he believed he was owed as severance. Today, Moonves and CBS take moved on, only his thoroughly tarnished reputation hasn't faded, earning him a spot on this list.
Hugh Grant, Monsanto
If yous desire to find chief executives that court controversy, start by looking at the companies that attract the most critics. Monsanto is considered by some to be the equivalent of the evil empire, putting minor farmers out of business and developing products that have been found to be unsafe.
The leader of Monsanto was destined to be a polarizing figure, which is why Hugh Grant made his way onto this listing. Monsanto definitely does good, but Grant's critics believe the bad outweighs the positive touch on. Possibly the company'due south acquisition by Bayer will change all that.
Marker Hurd, Oracle
A cinch mode for a CEO to go a hated effigy is to make a lot of coin. That is the primary gripe that critics seem to have with Mark Hurd, who is the co-CEO of computer software giant Oracle.
Mobs tend to break out the torches and pitchforks when they hear that somebody in boondocks makes approximately a gazillion times more than money than they do, and this reaction has become increasingly trendy in recent years. Information technology's easy for some to view super-wealthy CEOs like Hurd, who raked in $108.3 million this year in salary lone, equally an Ebenezer Scrooge type.
Safra Catz, Oracle
Safra Catz is the other co-CEO at Oracle, and she is paid just every bit handsomely as her male counterpart, Mark Hurd. And handsomely, if yous remember, means $108.three million in salary per year.
When you lot run one of the largest, most profitable and arguably virtually important companies in the world, possibly you will take home an almanac paycheck in the nine-figure range. Many say we get paid what nosotros're worth, just critics of Catz have a straightforward gripe: Nobody could possibly be worth that much. Nine-figure salaries definitely tend to divide opinions.
Indra Nooyi, PepsiCo
As society is becoming healthier and healthier, more and more than people take issue with the CEO of what is essentially a soda company making virtually $25 million per twelvemonth. Although Nooyi stepped down in 2018, she made waves with a series of public comments that essentially said it's not her task to regulate the public's diet.
She'due south not wrong, but enough of people took issue with the tone of the message besides every bit its content. When yous're making $100 million every four years, you could at least pretend to intendance about the obesity epidemic, correct?
Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase
Bankers may forever get a bad rap later on the financial crunch of 2008 ruined countless lives, and the banking industry was exposed as playing a meaning part in the crash. Jamie Dimon seems to be a decent guy, but he'southward a banker, which immediately makes people suspicious.
For that reason, he's got plenty of detractors. Additionally, his willingness to speak on a broad range of bug on very public media forums makes him something of a lightning rod for controversy. Dimon would probably tell you that controversy comes with his position every bit CEO of a major banking company. He would be right.
Brian Roberts, Comcast
Are you a Comcast client who is less than satisfied with the price and/or quality of your cable or internet service? Desire to know who you should blame for your displeasure? Information technology's Brian Roberts, CEO of Comcast!
That line of thinking probably isn't fair, simply as one of the top-five highest-paid CEOs on record, Roberts gets paid more enough to shoulder all the blame for his company's shortcomings. Wouldn't you be willing to take a fiddling bit of flack if you were raking in nearly $33 million per year? Sounds similar a pretty fair bargain.
Randall Stephenson, AT&T
Who doesn't take a complaint almost some aspect of their cell telephone provider? Seriously, no i is 100% satisfied with all aspects of their service. Randall Stephenson is ane of the few mobile company CEOs remaining, which means he bears the brunt of many complaints.
For i thing, phones have go unreasonably expensive. What was once a $300 device (at worst) with no strings attached has somehow get a $i,000-plus monstrosity that you lot can only buy if you sign upwards for a lifetime contract and put your children up as collateral. No wonder Stephenson, who makes roughly $29 million per year, is a controversial effigy.
James Gorman, Morgan Stanley
To exist fair, we are essentially listing the highest-paid CEOs at this point on the list. These people didn't exercise anything particularly upsetting, but in a time when people are struggling nether the weight of astronomically high prices, highly-paid CEOs are piece of cake targets.
That said, we hope that James Gorman is big into philanthropy, considering there is no way he and his family go through the $28-plus meg salary he makes each year. Information technology would be his correct to keep it all, merely beingness a inexpensive millionaire is never a proficient expect.
John Milligan, Gilead Sciences
Biotechnology seems to be a noble cause. Coming up with cures for HIV, AIDS, hepatitis and other deadly diseases provides a neat service, especially to those who desperately demand those treatments. Still, what could you possibly do on a daily ground to warrant an almanac salary of $26 million?
It's non cool to detest on the rich because they are rich — or is it? Enough of people dislike Gilead Sciences CEO John Milligan for no other reason than his annual bacon. It just goes to show yous that if you want to court some controversy, just make a lot of money.
Tim Cook, Apple
Who is going to willingly walk in the shadow of Steve Jobs? Tim Melt, that's who. The current CEO of Apple walked head-on into one of the tallest tasks in the mod business world: not dropping the ball on Jobs' massive tech empire.
The reviews of Cook'southward job functioning are somewhat mixed, and that is precisely why he is on this list. There was no way that Tim Cook was ever going to receive hulking praise when measured against Steve Jobs' revolutionary legacy, just he'southward got lots of fans for very good reasons.
Michael Corbat, Citigroup
A little tip: If you desire to be universally loved, don't get into cyberbanking. Another tip: If you lot don't want to be loathed, do not become the CEO of a massive banking concern like Citigroup. Plain, Michael Corbat isn't interested in the concept of being universally loved. He just wants to serve as the CEO of Citigroup.
That part will garner him more than $24 1000000 this twelvemonth, more than than almost professionals make in a lifetime. Obviously, jealousy is a factor in the Corbat hate, but is whatsoever of information technology justified?
Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing
Boeing is ane of the most important companies in the globe, so yous could understand how its CEO would make a pretty penny. Simply $23 million is one very pretty penny! Some might even say that penny is mode as well pretty.
This sentiment becomes even stronger when you consider that Boeing has undergone its fair share of controversy this year. CEOs tend to absorb the brunt of any bad PR, and with such a high salary, y'all would expect Muilenburg to take the bad publicity head-on. That doesn't mean he has to like information technology, though.
Larry Merlo, CVS
Chemist's-retailer hybrids like CVS and Walgreens are struggling, and it's no hush-hush why. With massive stores and a relatively inexplicable business model — we could merely order the stuff on Amazon, right? — these types of outlets are predicted by many to become the mode of the dinosaurs.
Yet, as workers at these chains have their hours cutting to relieve coin, the CEO makes nearly $22 million per twelvemonth. His fans say he deserves it for keeping the ship afloat, but his critics disagree, pointing out that a salary like that should come with innovative ideas to salvage the company by taking information technology in a modern management.
Mary Barra, Full general Motors
Is American automotive manufacturing back? Optimists may respond with an emphatic "Yes!", but critics point to CEOs like GM'southward Mary Barra, who makes almost $22 million in salary, claiming it's the same former tiptop-down power structure that has plagued the American motorcar industry for decades.
Her supporters have well-crafted arguments for why Barra deserves the compensation, only at the end of the twenty-four hours, anyone making $22 one thousand thousand per year is a tough sell for the mutual homo. For that reason, Mary Barra is one polarizing CEO. What do you think?
Jury Of Executive Opinion Method,
Source: https://www.consumersearch.com/technology/ceo-dividing-opinions-2019?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740007%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex&ueid=22442102-1f39-44fc-a692-4fc35b7ed2b7
Posted by: malonelencente.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Jury Of Executive Opinion Method"
Post a Comment